Bad Boy Bubby
Rolf de Heer (1993)

Download (.torrent)
Format: avi | Size: 1.4GB

Bad Boy Bubby was conceived as an experiment on virtually every level. Rolf de Heer worked on the script over a period of ten years, pushing it further into extremes with each redraft. He shot it in sequence, and with 32 different cinematographers – one for each new location – and recorded it in binaural sound, using radio microphones taped to the side of the head of Nicholas Hope, the actor playing Bubby. The film was going to be shot on weekends for $400,000, using out-of-date film stock, until an Italian producer, Domenico Procacci, read the script. He contributed the $400,000 but insisted the film be shot on good stock. It was eventually shot over nine weeks for a total budget of around $800,000. The film was shown in competition in Venice, where it won five prizes. ‘It tore the place apart’, Rolf de Heer said later.

He conceived the film as a parable about child abuse, but the material was too dark to use a child actor, so Bubby became an adult man who has been mistreated for 35 years. Bubby is an innocent. Even though he actually kills four people in the film, he is incapable of understanding his crimes. The first third of the film, inside the dungeon where he is raised, establishes a crucial reality. When Bubby eventually leaves there, we believe in his sensory deprivation, and that everything he experiences is new. We also know that he’s smarter than he looks. The film creates a lot of enjoyably vulgar comedy out of his interactions with the world around him. It’s not stated that this is Adelaide, but de Heer presents a view of his adopted home city that’s so harsh it’s funny.

De Heer was born in Holland and came to Australia at the age of eight, in 1959. Bubby’s first impressions of the city could have something to do with that experience of a child in a new country, although de Heer has always stressed that Bubby ‘is in no way anything to do with me … I have two parents who are terrific and I am doubly indebted to them for bringing me up mentally healthy – although some people have their doubts when they look at this film’.

Alongside the film’s low comedy, there is always a set of much larger questions, to do with existence and religion. Bubby has been raised with a terrible fear of God’s power and cruelty. Out in the wider world, he gets plenty of evidence of mankind’s cruelty, and the lack of piety of some in the church. In a church, he is drawn to the sound of the organ, which is being played by Norman Kaye, as a character known in the credits as The Scientist. This man is one of the few who show him kindness, but he also insists that there is no God, and that it’s Bubby’s duty to insult him. On the other hand, Bubby falls in love with Angel, who is a believer, and a good advertisement for Christian kindness (although she and Bubby have much in common in upbringing – her parents are religious maniacs who persecute her horribly).

The film’s most controversial aspect was not its depiction of cruelty towards a human, but the depiction of cruelty towards the cat. When the film was released in Italy, a coalition of animal rights groups tried to set up a boycott of Australian products, alleging that the cat was tortured and smothered in the film. Rolf de Heer has said that none of that is true; the cat scenes were carefully filmed, with a veterinarian and animal cruelty inspector on set. Nicholas Hope, in an on-stage interview included on the dvd of the film, says there were two cats, one of which became a pet of a crew member. The other was a feral cat that was put down by a vet after filming (as with most feral cats that are caught in Australia).

–Paul Byrnes, curator australianscreen

Share This